<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White unibody MacBook 2.26GHz or Pro 2.53GHz for video?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/</link>
	<description>cheap macbooks cheap macbook air cheap macbook pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:12:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: brotherscain</title>
		<link>http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>brotherscain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbookmart.com/?p=1581#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I run Final Cut Express on my MacBook Pro 15&quot; with no issues at all.

Hardware Overview:

  Model Name:MacBook Pro
  Model Identifier:MacBookPro4,1
  Processor Name:Intel Core 2 Duo
  Processor Speed:2.5 GHz
  Number Of Processors:1
  Total Number Of Cores:2
  L2 Cache:6 MB
  Memory:4 GB
  Bus Speed:800 MHz
  Boot ROM Version:MBP41.00C1.B03

Save a few bucks, do not order extra RAM from Apple, get that from an electronics store like Fry&#039;s. You will save some cash that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run Final Cut Express on my MacBook Pro 15&quot; with no issues at all.</p>
<p>Hardware Overview:</p>
<p>  Model Name:MacBook Pro<br />
  Model Identifier:MacBookPro4,1<br />
  Processor Name:Intel Core 2 Duo<br />
  Processor Speed:2.5 GHz<br />
  Number Of Processors:1<br />
  Total Number Of Cores:2<br />
  L2 Cache:6 MB<br />
  Memory:4 GB<br />
  Bus Speed:800 MHz<br />
  Boot ROM Version:MBP41.00C1.B03</p>
<p>Save a few bucks, do not order extra RAM from Apple, get that from an electronics store like Fry&#8217;s. You will save some cash that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macdudeosx</title>
		<link>http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>macdudeosx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbookmart.com/?p=1581#comment-829</guid>
		<description>If your going to be doing lots of video editing you might want the pro. The pro (not the 13&quot; pro) comes with two graphics cards (as opposed to macbook&#039;s one) and a firewire port for faster data transfer. It also comes with a express 3/4 card slot for expansion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your going to be doing lots of video editing you might want the pro. The pro (not the 13&quot; pro) comes with two graphics cards (as opposed to macbook&#8217;s one) and a firewire port for faster data transfer. It also comes with a express 3/4 card slot for expansion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kahless</title>
		<link>http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kahless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbookmart.com/?p=1581#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Macdude is right. Go with the MacBook Pro and if you can afford it, get a 15&quot; or 17&quot;. It&#039;s easier on the eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Macdude is right. Go with the MacBook Pro and if you can afford it, get a 15&quot; or 17&quot;. It&#8217;s easier on the eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe S</title>
		<link>http://macbookmart.com/white-unibody-macbook-2-26ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macbookmart.com/?p=1581#comment-831</guid>
		<description>From a Video editor to another: last year i started video production. I was given from my graduation present from the 8th grade a 2.4 GHZ iMac 20&#039; with 1GB ram and 250 GB hard drive, and Final Cut Express. ?ut at my school we started learning with Final Cut Studio, which i figure out is much much easier to work with than express. Now, a year later, i Have an iMac, a Macbook Pro 15&#039; 500GB HD 3.06 GHZ Intel Core 2 Duo and 8GB RAM and Final Cut Pro Box set. and Photoshop CS4 extended to top it all off. The thing is, In my video life, Final cut pro Has a wide extent of tools but they are are tucked away in secret locations which requires you to be indiana jones and go out and find them. I honestly prefer Sony Vegas 8.0 because all the tools are staring at you in the face. The visual tools are much more realistic and the audio editing doesn&#039;t require you to go to logic Studio to perfect the audio. I do use Final Cut Pro at school, but i use sony vegas for personal projects. and i was able to buy Sony Vegas 7.0 Box set with a Dell tower [700 GB HD, 2.93 GHZ 7 GB RAM] 27&#039; monitor and BOSE speakers for under $2000. To answer you question. 2.53 GHZ with 250 GB. the truth about big hard drives is it takes a longer time to send the signal because theres too much room in the data banks. but i would go with the DELL+ Sony Vegas solution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Video editor to another: last year i started video production. I was given from my graduation present from the 8th grade a 2.4 GHZ iMac 20&#8242; with 1GB ram and 250 GB hard drive, and Final Cut Express. ?ut at my school we started learning with Final Cut Studio, which i figure out is much much easier to work with than express. Now, a year later, i Have an iMac, a Macbook Pro 15&#8242; 500GB HD 3.06 GHZ Intel Core 2 Duo and 8GB RAM and Final Cut Pro Box set. and Photoshop CS4 extended to top it all off. The thing is, In my video life, Final cut pro Has a wide extent of tools but they are are tucked away in secret locations which requires you to be indiana jones and go out and find them. I honestly prefer Sony Vegas 8.0 because all the tools are staring at you in the face. The visual tools are much more realistic and the audio editing doesn&#8217;t require you to go to logic Studio to perfect the audio. I do use Final Cut Pro at school, but i use sony vegas for personal projects. and i was able to buy Sony Vegas 7.0 Box set with a Dell tower [700 GB HD, 2.93 GHZ 7 GB RAM] 27&#8242; monitor and BOSE speakers for under $2000. To answer you question. 2.53 GHZ with 250 GB. the truth about big hard drives is it takes a longer time to send the signal because theres too much room in the data banks. but i would go with the DELL+ Sony Vegas solution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

